What is the test for intervenor status in a public interest action?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from Gibralter Mines Ltd. v Harvey, 2021 BCSC 927 (CanLII):

Because the purpose of a public interest intervention is to shed light on an issue, the cases articulate a rule that an applicant is not to be granted intervenor status simply in order to argue that one side or the other should win. Justice Bennett states the rule as follows in Friedmann v. MacGarvie, 2012 BCCA 109:

Other Questions


Can a public statute, empowering public actors to accomplish public goals, alone give rise to a private duty between those public actors and a particular member of the public? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the balancing of the public interest served by the police conduct and the liberty interest interfered with by that conduct? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for balancing the relevant competing interests of privacy and public interest? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can intervenor status be granted to an applicant without a direct interest in the case? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the legal test for an intervenor in a motion where the intervenor is not a party to the action? (British Columbia, Canada)
What are the costs of an action commenced in the public interest? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a plaintiff in a personal injury action commence an action against a defendant in the same action against the same defendant? (British Columbia, Canada)
How have special costs been awarded in civil actions where the purpose of the civil action was to silence public opposition? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test to determine whether a third party action should be heard separately or within the main action? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the difference between an action and a similar action? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.