How have the courts interpreted the construction of this clause in the Construction of a Statement of Claim?
Ontario, Canada
The following excerpt is from Trust and Loan Co. of Canada v. Lawrason et al., 1881 CanLII 11 (ON CA):
The plaintiffs properly relied upon The Royal Canadian Bank v. Kelly, 19 C.P., 96, as an authority in their favour on the construction of this clause, as it does not appear that that case was reversed on any of the grounds upon which Mr. Justice Gwynne’s decision was founded.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
How have the courts interpreted privilege in a motion to amend a statement of claim? (Ontario, Canada)
How have the courts interpreted the principles of the Court of Arbitration for the purpose of making decisions at an arbitrator rather than the court? (Ontario, Canada)
In what circumstances will an arbitrator be bound to follow the interpretation of Arbitrator Starkman’s interpretation of the Interpretation of the Arbitrator's Interpretation in a dispute? (Ontario, Canada)
How have courts interpreted statements relying upon statements relied upon by the applicants? (Ontario, Canada)
Can a statement in a Statement of Claim be an admission? (Ontario, Canada)
How have the courts interpreted a custody agreement where the mother was granted sole custody of the child by the court? (Ontario, Canada)
Is a motion for a stay of execution pending a counter-claim, cross-claim and third party claim valid? (Ontario, Canada)
Is a plaintiff's new statement of claim that describes the nature of their employment contract relevant to a whistleblowing claim? (Ontario, Canada)
How have the courts treated the fact of republication in a Statement of Claim? (Ontario, Canada)
Can a plaintiff amend the statement of claim to assert constructive dismissal damages? (Ontario, Canada)
