Can counsel acting on behalf of the respondent to an application for summary judgment take the second course described in Placer?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from Wong v. Field, 2012 BCSC 1141 (CanLII):

In Brown v. Douglas, 2011 BCCA 521 (CanLII), 2011 B.C.C.A. 521, Madam Justice Newbury, writing for the court, stated at para. 30: The authorities are clear, however, that (as counsel for the plaintiffs acknowledged at the hearing of this appeal) counsel acting on behalf of the respondent to an application for summary judgment who takes the second course described in Placer "runs a risk". This is the risk that the court will not agree that the case is not appropriate for summary trial and may give judgment against his or her client.

Other Questions


When there are two defendants in a motion for summary judgment against each other, does the court have any authority to grant summary judgment? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is there any case law where an unsuccessful applicant for Rule 18A application for a summary judgment or cost of costs? (British Columbia, Canada)
How has the Respondent Respondent responded to an application for a change in parenting time? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a respondent respond to an application with a sur-reply responding to new issues raised in reply? (British Columbia, Canada)
In what circumstances will a summary trial be held on an application for summary trial? (British Columbia, Canada)
How has the Respondent Respondent dealt with a default judgment in a personal injury case? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a law firm representing the respondent in a personal injury action be restrained from acting for the respondent? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test to succeed on an application for summary judgment? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can an application be brought to dismiss an application under s. 27(1)(c) of the Rules of Civil Procedure Act? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can an applicant and respondent at a summary trial rely on expert reports, examinations for discovery, interrogatories, use of admissions, and expert reports? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.