What is the reasonableness of a settlement based on risk and cost factors?

Ontario, Canada


The following excerpt is from Scott v. Ontario Business College (1977) Ltd., 2004 CanLII 12288 (ON SC):

The above referenced criteria are simply guidelines and do not constitute a rigid set of criteria for assessing the reasonableness of a settlement. In Tesluk v. Boots Pharmaceutical PLC, 2002 CarswellOnt 1266, (Para 11), Justice Winkler held that risk and cost factors were important issues in assessing the reasonableness of a settlement.

Other Questions


What is the test for reasonable grounds for establishing that reasonable grounds are reasonable grounds? (Ontario, Canada)
What are the reasons and reasons of a hearing officer’s analysis of disposition factors? (Ontario, Canada)
Is a grievor’s base rate of pay based on her actual income (which is inclusive of overtime and other premium rates), not just her base rate pay? (Ontario, Canada)
Is there any case law where an applicant has abandoned a claim at a settlement conference to bring the case closer to settlement? (Ontario, Canada)
Is there any case law that supports the argument that debt is to be valued based on the reasonable likelihood of ever being repaid? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the effect of minutes of settlement or a settlement agreement containing an express prohibition against a child changing their name? (Ontario, Canada)
What are the reasons for the release of reasons for judgement? (Ontario, Canada)
What factors must be considered in determining whether to enforce a settlement under Rule 49.09? (Ontario, Canada)
What factors factor in determining whether a child becomes disentitled to support for education expenses after leaving the relationship? (Ontario, Canada)
What are the factors that apply when a party seeks to plead to a finding that a party has not followed the 5 factors in its pleading? (Ontario, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.