Is there a prima facie right to a jury when the cause of action is below the applicable monetary limit?

Alberta, Canada


The following excerpt is from Williams-Baker v. Russell, 2004 ABQB 250 (CanLII):

Cases that support the proposition that the right to trial by jury is a substantive right of great importance and a party should not be deprived of it except for cogent reasons (see, for example, King v. Colonial Homes Ltd. et al, 1956 CanLII 13 (SCC), [1956] S.C.R 528 at 533) add no value to this debate because, in my judgment, for the reasons I have expressed, there is no prima facie right to a jury when a cause of action is below the applicable monetary limit.

Other Questions


Can a party to an action extend the action by unilateral action, when nothing has been done to materially advance the action for five years or more? (Alberta, Canada)
Is some damage sufficient for a cause of action to arise and a limitation period to start run? (Alberta, Canada)
Does the discoverability rule of limitations apply to the discoveryability of a cause of action? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the test for an application to strike a proceeding on the basis that it does not disclose a cause of action? (Alberta, Canada)
Is a failure to commence an action within the applicable limitation period a complete defence? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the test for determining the applicable limitation period under a statute of limitation? (Alberta, Canada)
Is an application to strike out a pleading on the ground it does not disclose a cause of action an attack on the sufficiency of the pleading? (Alberta, Canada)
Is there a cause of action against a government authority for negligent breach of statutory duty? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the meaning of intent without corresponding action in a divorce action? (Alberta, Canada)
What are the legal principles applicable to this action? (Alberta, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.