Lederer J faced the same interpretive challenge in Babakar v. Brown [7], that is to say, how far the right to obtain foundational information extends. He noted that it has been established that it is improper to allow questions that set out to contradict, or confirm, the findings of experts. Such questions enter the realm of cross-examination.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.