In Smith v. Arndt,[19] Cory J. confirmed that the patient has a right to information: Reibl [v. Hughes] is a very significant and leading authority. It marks the rejection of the paternalistic approach to determining how much information should be given to patients. It emphasizes the patient’s right to know and ensures that patients will have the benefit of a high standard of disclosure.[20]
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.