In Regina v. Tran (1994), 1994 CanLII 56 (SCC), 92 C.C.C. (3d) 218 (S.C.C.), at p. 255, the court described the right to an interpreter as belonging to a person “who genuinely cannot speak and/or understand the language of the proceedings”. At pp. 241-2, the court observed that, “it must be clear that the [claimant] was actually in need of interpreter assistance … the right to [an] interpreter … is not an automatic or absolute one” – the claimant “must demonstrate that he or she satisfies … the conditions precedent to entitlement of the right”.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.