What is the proper approach to assessing non-pecuniary damages in a motor vehicle accident?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from Brundige v Bolton, 2018 BCSC 1843 (CanLII):

The proper approach to assessing non-pecuniary damages is not controversial. The award is made to ameliorate the condition of the plaintiff. It must be based on her particular situation and that requires the court to assess and appreciate the nature of her loss. The award must be fair and reasonable to both parties. The factors to consider are set out in Stapley v. Hejslet, 2006 BCCA 34 at para. 46, and have been expanded upon in subsequent decisions.

Other Questions


What is the test for assessing damages for non-pecuniary damages in a motor vehicle accident? (British Columbia, Canada)
In a motor vehicle accident involving a stolen vehicle, can the driver of the stolen vehicle be held liable for damages? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the ICBC's approach to assessing damages in a motor vehicle accident? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the proper assessment of non-pecuniary damages in a motor vehicle accident? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for assessing damages in a motor vehicle accident? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the standard of damages for non-pecuniary damages in a motor vehicle accident? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for assessing damage caused by a motor vehicle accident? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for determining whether a motor vehicle accident is an accident or an accident? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for assessing both contributory and quantum damages in a motor vehicle accident case? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the proper head of damages for loss of earning capacity in a motor vehicle accident? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.