Does instrument 2178AG apply to lots 33 to 42 inclusive?

Alberta, Canada


The following excerpt is from Barker v. Palmer, 2005 ABQB 815 (CanLII):

It is equally clear from the fact that instrument 2178AG applies to lots 33 to 42 inclusive that the vendors imposed the same restrictions on all of the lots in the scheme. There is no requirement that the covenant apply generally in a subdivision or other geographical circumscription. Instead, the fact that the restrictive covenant applies to all lots made part of the scheme suffices to satisfy this condition. Crump v. Kernahan at para 17.

Other Questions


Does Rule 753.11 apply to an application that seeks declaratory relief? (Alberta, Canada)
Does the burden of proof against the Registrar of Motor Vehicles apply to motor vehicle accident claims? (Alberta, Canada)
Does the Charter apply to discriminatory provisions of the September 1951 Proclamation? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the test to apply to an explanation for possession given by Phon? (Alberta, Canada)
Does the principle of res judicata apply when one party has brought a new cause of action against the same party? (Alberta, Canada)
Does section 77(1) of the Rules of Civil Procedure apply to a plaintiff's accident report? (Alberta, Canada)
Does the meaning of the term "book debts" apply to a bankrupt? (Alberta, Canada)
Does the strong prima facie case test apply to a restrictive covenant affecting employment? (Alberta, Canada)
Does s. 25(1) of the Criminal Code apply to police officers who use excessive force? (Alberta, Canada)
Can a mortgage clause in a policy of fire insurance apply to a mortgagee who is not entitled to a loan under the policy? (Alberta, Canada)

There are no other similar questions at this time.