Is an interlocutory injunction enforceable against the Minister of Justice?

The Respondents also submit that any costs awarded in this litigation to date should be in the cause as the matter involves an interlocutory injunction. They submit that the preponderant consideration is whether the injunction will effectively end the proceedings. When the interlocutory injunction does not raise issues discrete from the underlying action and does not constitute a final determination of the parties’ rights, but rather protects the Applicant’s position pending trial, costs should be in the cause, argue the Respondents. Satscho v. Ontario (Minister of Government Services), [2008] O.J. No. 348.