The respondents argue that a review by this court of the entire record would find that there is no confused or contradictory evidence regarding key issues. In that regard, they rely upon Hill v. Hamilton-Wentworth (Regional Municipality) Police Services Board 2007 SCC 41 (CanLII) at para. 101 which states: Where the record discloses all that is required to be known to permit appellate review, less detailed reasons may be acceptable. This means that less detailed reasons may be required in cases with an extensive evidentiary record…
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.