The respondent submitted that there was no discriminatory outcome or impact of the interview questions. The situation here is similar to that in Kailani v. G4S Security Services (Canada) Ltd., 2011 HRTO 1790, where the adjudicator concluded (at para. 38) that there was no evidence to indicate that asking a question referring to the applicant’s diabetes, differentially treated or disadvantaged the applicant in his efforts to obtain employment.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.