The respondent submitted that costs should be discounted because no offers to settle were made. However, this is only a factor when there can be some reasonable element of compromise to the motion. See: Beaver v. Hill, supra. Here, lesser enforcement options had already been attempted by the applicant, without any sustained change to the respondent’s conduct. She continued to arbitrarily deny access. The applicant reasonably pursued the contempt remedy.
Get a full legal research memo!
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexsei.com.