Although the respondent appears to have a strong case for the exclusion of the assets, I agree it is premature for the court to make a decision on that when additional relevant evidence may be adduced through examination for discovery. Counsel for the claimant fairly noted that evidence at the discovery may either help or hinder the ability of the claimant to resist the claim for exclusion. However, I note in Remmem v. Remmem, Justice Butler is careful to note at paragraph 52:
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.