What is the substance of the petitioner’s argument in the Superior Court of Justice's consideration of allegations of bias?
British Columbia, Canada
The following excerpt is from Tepei v. ICBC, 2007 BCSC 1694 (CanLII):
As to the substance of the petitioner’s argument, the respondent relied on Weywakum Indian Band v. Canada, supra, for the proposition that an apprehension of bias must rest “on serious grounds in light of the strong presumption of judicial impartiality.”
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
In what circumstances will the Supreme Court in BCSC 871 interpret the principles of the Court of Appeal in the context of the Canadian Court of Justice's decision on the doctrine of common law? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is the Chief Justice of the Court of Appeal of the Supreme Court of B.C holding that the Court has jurisdiction to determine whether a person who is not a party to a particular type of tortfeasor has a valid claim? (British Columbia, Canada)
What are the principles used by the Court of Appeal in making an order to refer the issue to the Superior Court of Justice? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does the Superior Court of Justice have concurrent jurisdiction with the Federal Court to hear a habeas corpus application? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the relevant date of the date of a motion in the Superior Court of Justice against the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for a stay of execution of an application for a motion to prevent the application from being heard in the Superior Court of Justice? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for petitioning the Supreme Court of BC to overturn a decision made by the BC Court of Justice in favour of a slata plan? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does the Superior Court of Justice have jurisdiction to adjudicate claims of wrongful dismissal and breach of an employment contract? (British Columbia, Canada)
In what circumstances will the Court of Appeal in the Supreme Court consider 4 costs considerations? (British Columbia, Canada)
How have the courts interpreted the evidentiary presumptions in the context of an allegation of intent to pervert the course of justice? (British Columbia, Canada)
