What is the test for assessing whether an offer ought to have been reasonably accepted?
British Columbia, Canada
The following excerpt is from L.E.M. v. D.M.I., 2014 BCSC 831 (CanLII):
The respondent relies on Richardson v. Richardson, 2012 BCSC 1187 [Richardson], for the proposition that considering whether an offer ought to have been reasonably accepted is to be assessed at the time the offer is received, not based on the results following trial.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the test for whether an offer was an offer that ought reasonably to have been accepted? (British Columbia, Canada)
When is an offer not an offer that ought reasonably have been accepted? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the impact of hindsight analysis when assessing whether an offer to settle was reasonably accepted? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for determining whether an offer is reasonably reasonable to have been accepted? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the burden of proving that a party making an offer to a prospective buyer of a dog is reasonable to expect that the offer ought to have been accepted? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for whether an offer ought reasonably to have been accepted? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the argument that reasonable counsel ought to have encouraged the respondent to accept an offer of financial support? (British Columbia, Canada)
How to read the reasons of the adjudicator as a whole to assess whether the decision was reasonable? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for whether an offer to settle was reasonably accepted? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the reasonableness factor in determining whether a plaintiff would have accepted an offer to settle? (British Columbia, Canada)
