The respondent argues the claimant has the capacity to work and likely would have done so all along, but for his addictive behaviours. She describes him as intelligent with “quality working business acumen”. Relying upon Brandner v. Brandner, 2001 BCSC 284, aff’d 2002 BCCA 394, she submits the court can impute income where a party has stopped working because of addiction issues and depression for the purposes of support.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.