The Respondent argues that both blameworthiness of the payor, in the sense of active misleading, and diligence by the payee in pursuing payment, must be shown before retroactive support can be ordered. This describes the requirements of the exceptional circumstances test (Wishlow v. Bingham, paras. 36-38). It does not take into account the change that has taken place with the new appropriate circumstances test.
Get a full legal research memo!
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexsei.com.