The respondent submitted the claimant’s position on duress is untenable because the facts do not fall into line with the types of oppressive conduct Spence J. discussed in Saxon v. Saxon, [1976] B.C.J. No. 1309 (S.C.) [Saxon], at para. 16: (a) a “physical compulsion of the person, which must be very rare”; (b) a “threat to the person’s life or limb” to a close relative; (c) a “threat of a physical beating”; or (d) a “threat of imprisonment”.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.