Can a confession be used as evidence against a co-accused?

Alberta, Canada


The following excerpt is from R. v. Klippenstein, 1981 ABCA 14 (CanLII):

For this reason an admission is evidence against only the person making it. No such limitation is required for the res gestae statement. As one of the events of the occurrence being investigated, once admitted it becomes evidence for or against all participants in the trial affected by it. Thus in my opinion, the principle enunciated in McFall v. The Queen (supra) that the confession of an accused may not be used in relation to the case against a co-accused, has no application to a res gestae statement.

Other Questions


Is new evidence submitted as fresh evidence admissible at trial? (Alberta, Canada)
What constitutes “non-expert opinion evidence” in identification evidence at trial? (Alberta, Canada)
When can a witness give evidence that is not in evidence at trial? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the test for a voluntary confession under the confessions rule? (Alberta, Canada)
Is character evidence admitted and accepted into evidence in a human rights panel hearing? (Alberta, Canada)
What are a number of cases that support the argument that objection to admissibility of evidence is to be made at the time the evidence is tendered? (Alberta, Canada)
Is a finder of fact not compelled to discount the evidence of a witness on a point when an opposing witness has not been confronted and challenged with the contrary version of the evidence? (Alberta, Canada)
Can a statement of claim be struck where there is evidence of correspondence and negotiations between the parties? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the test for accepting as true the evidence of a witness who has not been cross-examined? (Alberta, Canada)
What entitlement does the Court have to examine evidence that is not in the record? (Alberta, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.