What factors must be considered when the reason for a child's inability to withdraw from their parents care is post-secondary education?

A helpful but non-exhaustive list of factors to consider when the reason for the child’s inability to withdraw from their parents’ care is post-secondary education is found in Farden v. Farden, 1993 CanLII 2570, 48 R.F.L. (3d) 60 (B.C.S.C.) at pp. 64-65: (1) whether the child is in fact enrolled in a course of studies and whether it is a full time or part time course of studies; (2) whether or not the child has applied for or is eligible for student loans or other financial assistance; (3) the career plans of the child, i.e., whether the child has some reasonable and appropriate plan or is simply going to college because there is nothing better to do; (4) the ability of the child to contribute to his own support through part-time employment; (5) the age of the child; (6) the child's past academic performance, whether the child is demonstrating success in the chosen course of studies; (7) what plans the parents made for the education of their children, particularly where those plans were made during cohabitation; (8) at least in the case of a mature child who has reached the age of majority, whether or not the child has unilaterally terminated a relationship from the parent from whom support is sought.