What are the implications of a Bullock or Sanderson Order on a motion for personal injury?
Ontario, Canada
The following excerpt is from Radmanish v. Sulaimankahail et al., 2014 ONSC 6494 (CanLII):
As Carthy J. A. explained in Rooney v. Graham (para. 6): The rationale [sic] behind both orders is the same. Where the allocation of responsibility is uncertain, usually because of interwoven facts, it is often reasonable to proceed through trial against more than one defendant. In these cases, a Bullock or Sanderson order provides a plaintiff with an appropriate form of relief.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Is a motion to add as parties to a personal injury action for personal injury costs granted? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the legal test for disbursements of personal injury compensation in personal injury cases? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for a motions judge to dismiss a motion for personal injury? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for a judge to order personal costs against counsel in a personal injury case? (Ontario, Canada)
In what circumstances will a motion judge order summary judgment against a party in a personal injury matter? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for a motion of no confidence in a motion by a judge in a personal injury case? (Ontario, Canada)
What are the grounds for appeal against a motion judge's order that dismissed a number of personal injury claims? (Ontario, Canada)
What are the costs of a motion to certify a motion for personal injury? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the current state of the law on personal injury representation in personal injury cases? (Ontario, Canada)
How have the courts in Canada dealt with the issue of personal injury cases involving personal injury claims? (Ontario, Canada)
