The test as to whether the questions in dispute need to be answered is whether they bear “a semblance of relevance” to the issues in the action, in this case, the issue of damages. The ultimate reasonableness of the relevant issues is for the trial judge. A discovery of wide latitude should be permitted but there are limits. “Semblance of relevance” is not to be interpreted as an open door to harass a party by exploring all dealings that he may be involved in. The questions must relate to relevant issues. (Kay v. Posluns, 71 O.R. (2d) 238).
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.