What is the test for a party to be convicted of assisting the actual perpetrator of a murder?

Manitoba, Canada


The following excerpt is from R v Sorokowski, 2018 MBPC 37 (CanLII):

The person aiding the individual who commits the murder must appreciate that the actual perpetrator intends to cause bodily harm of a kind likely to result in death, and be reckless whether death ensues or not. There is no requirement that the party desire that the victim die. However, the party must have the same intent as the person who actually committed the murder in order to be convicted (see Hibbert v. The Queen, (1995) 1995 CanLII 110 (SCC), 99 C.C.C. (3d) 193 (S.C.C)).

Other Questions


What is the test for a convicted murderer to be convicted of first degree murder? (Manitoba, Canada)
Is a party entitled to party and party costs? (Manitoba, Canada)
Is a party entitled to an accounting from the Financial Reporting Authority (FPA) without a separation of the parties? (Manitoba, Canada)
What is the standard for establishing that there is evidence that there was prior to and at the time of the murder, and that the accused was a party to the crime? (Manitoba, Canada)
Can a self-represented litigant in a personal injury action proceed without the assistance of a defending party? (Manitoba, Canada)
Is there any case law where an umpire considered information of one party without the knowledge of the other party? (Manitoba, Canada)
Are party and party costs appropriate on Class III on a motion? (Manitoba, Canada)
In what circumstances will a party be bound by a third party's expectation of receiving something in return? (Manitoba, Canada)
If a decision is not in favour of both parties, should both parties consider retaining counsel? (Manitoba, Canada)
Can an application to suppress the true identity of parties to contemplated litigation be made without notice to the other parties? (Manitoba, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.