What is the impact of a judicial decision on the management of public funds?

Yukon, Canada


The following excerpt is from Canada (Attorney General) v. Yukon (Territorial Court), 1996 CanLII 3294 (YK CA):

105 The Queen v. Schachter, 1992 CanLII 74 (SCC), [1992] 2 S.C.R. 679, 93 D.L.R. (4th) 1, contains a helpful discussion in regard to the management of public funds and the budgetary repercussions of judicial decisions, within the context of the remedial options available under s. 52 of the Charter (see p. 21, D.L.R.).

Other Questions


What is the test for reviewing an arbitrator’s decision? (Yukon, Canada)
Does a denial of a right to a fair hearing always render a decision invalid? (Yukon, Canada)
What is the impact of the "historic trade-off" emphasized by defendants’ counsel? (Yukon, Canada)
What is the impact of a call for tender in the context of a procurement process? (Yukon, Canada)
How have the reasons of a tribunal decision been interpreted by chambers judges? (Yukon, Canada)
Can a decision of a different court be varied? (Yukon, Canada)
What is the test for obtaining evidence of when a judge made a decision? (Yukon, Canada)
What is the impact of issue estoppel on collateral attack? (Yukon, Canada)
What is the impact of the fifth criterion in assessing damages? (Yukon, Canada)
What is the legal test for determining whether a plaintiff has met the proper legal test? (Yukon, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.