What is the case law in Canada dealing with conditional sentences for possession of marijuana?
Alberta, Canada
The following excerpt is from R. v. Norcott, 1999 ABCA 36 (CanLII):
The leading case in this jurisdiction dealing with conditional sentences is The Queen v. Brady which, coincidentally, also dealt with possession for the purposes of trafficking in marijuana.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the range of conditional sentences for smoking marijuana near a school playground? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the range of sentences available to appeal against car theft sentences? (Alberta, Canada)
Is there a duty of honourable dealing with Canada? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the leading case in Canada dealing with the availability of prohibition in these circumstances? (Alberta, Canada)
Is a client’s instructions not to obey trust conditions an excuse for breach of trust conditions? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the appropriate conditional sentence for perjury? (Alberta, Canada)
Is possession of marijuana for the purposes of trafficking a freedom of expression? (Alberta, Canada)
Does s. 717(4) of the English Draft Code (a) prohibit a judge from making a sentence for a second offence that is already been imposed by another judge in the case in which he is sentencing? (Alberta, Canada)
Is there a presumption in law that if a person is in possession of property and making use of it that such possession and use is lawful? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the difference between individualized sentencing and sentencing parity? (Alberta, Canada)
