In Gratt v. The Queen, 1982 CanLII 33 (SCC),  2 S.C.R. 819; 45 N.R. 451, Dickson, J., at pp. 836-837 (S.C.R.) rejected the general proposition that a nonexpert witness's opinion upon the ultimate issue must be excluded when he stated at p. 837 (S.C.R.): "I can see no reason in principle or in common sense why a lay witness should not be permitted to testify in the form of an opinion if, by doing so, he is able more accurately to express the facts he perceived."
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexsei.com.