Is there any case law where a verdict of guilty is properly rooted in the evidence of a single witness?

Ontario, Canada


The following excerpt is from R. v. S.B., 2021 ONSC 8005 (CanLII):

A verdict of guilty may, in some cases, be properly rooted in the evidence of a single witness: Vetrovec v. The Queen, 1982 CanLII 20 (SCC), [1982] 1 S.C.R. 811, at pp. 819-820. Corroboration is not required in this case.

Other Questions


Can a verdict of guilty be safely founded on the evidence of a single witness? (Ontario, Canada)
Does the defense have to provide affidavit evidence as to the names of the witnesses and the purpose and relevance of each witness? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for determining if there is any evidence that a reasonable jury can return a verdict of guilty? (Ontario, Canada)
Is there any evidence in which a reasonable jury can return a verdict of guilty? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for using the word "similar fact evidence" in a motion where the evidence is not the same fact evidence? (Ontario, Canada)
Is a witness’s evidence considered in the context of the totality of the evidence? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the impact of a witness’s testimony on the evidence? (Ontario, Canada)
Can a conclusion or opinion from a witness be admitted as non-expert opinion evidence? (Ontario, Canada)
Can a witness who has not been engaged by or on behalf of a party to the litigation give five opinion evidence for the truth of their opinion? (Ontario, Canada)
Can a witness testify as to statements made to that witness by someone else? (Ontario, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.