What is the test for a motion to admit fresh evidence at a hearing?

Manitoba, Canada


The following excerpt is from Keystone Agri-Motive (2005) Inc. v., 2014 MBCA 109 (CanLII):

The panel dismissed the fresh evidence motion at the hearing because the appellant failed to satisfy the four well-known criteria for the admission of fresh evidence. See Palmer v. The Queen, 1979 CanLII 8 (SCC), [1980] 1 S.C.R. 759. In particular, he did not establish that the evidence was not available at the time of the hearing of the application (the due diligence criteria). As well, he failed to address the requirement that the proposed evidence was reasonably capable of belief. Conclusion

Other Questions


Can a motion for the introduction of fresh evidence be dismissed at the hearing? (Manitoba, Canada)
Does admitting expert evidence after the conclusion of the proceeding before the Master change the nature of that hearing? (Manitoba, Canada)
What is the test for determining whether there is sufficient evidence at a preliminary hearing? (Manitoba, Canada)
What is the current state of the law on a motion of motion for personal injury? (Manitoba, Canada)
What is the effect of lay opinion evidence on a summary judgment motion? (Manitoba, Canada)
What is the test for refusing to hear a motion for contempt of court? (Manitoba, Canada)
In a motion for directed verdict, in what circumstances will the trial judge not have considered the evidence of Timothy? (Manitoba, Canada)
Is a failure to admit or deny relevant evidence a breach of natural justice? (Manitoba, Canada)
What are the principles to apply in the context of a motion by a plaintiff to have his case considered on the merits of the motion? (Manitoba, Canada)
What is the standard of review of a motion judge's decision not to interfere with the decision of the motion judge? (Manitoba, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.