Can an accessory to a criminal be found guilty of perverting the course of justice for his own benefit?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from R. v. Bedi, 2016 BCSC 1930 (CanLII):

Acts undertaken by the accessory for his own benefit, such as to divert suspicion from himself, without regard to what would happen to the principal offender, would not constitute this necessary purpose: Morris v. The Queen, 1979 CanLII 243 (SCC), [1979] 2 S.C.R. 1041.

Other Questions


Is there a new trial for the defence in the case of a man who was found not guilty of assault but found guilty of the charge on self-defence? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a Judicial Justice of the Peace who issued an arrest warrant for an alleged criminal offence be found to have committed a Charter violation? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for the offence of conspiracy to pervert the course of justice? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is there any case law where a plaintiff has been found not guilty of any criminal negligence? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a court order the production of a statement of intent to pervert the course of justice? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the penalty for a police officer found guilty of gross misconduct in a criminal case? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for determining whether a person can be found guilty of sexual assault under s. 27(1)(b) of the Criminal Code? (British Columbia, Canada)
How have the courts interpreted the evidentiary presumptions in the context of an allegation of intent to pervert the course of justice? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for establishing that a claim can be brought against a defendant who has never been found guilty of any criminal offence? (British Columbia, Canada)
What are the legal tests for determining whether a person can be found guilty of a criminal offence? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.