What is the purpose and use of evidence of a first complaint?

Saskatchewan, Canada


The following excerpt is from R. v. Pelletier, 1973 CanLII 886 (SK CA):

The purpose and use to be made of the evidence of a first complaint was set out in Regina v. Lillyman, [1896] 2 QB 167, when Hawkins J. said at p. 177: “The evidence is admissible only upon the ground that it was a complaint of that which is charged against the prisoner, and can be legitimately used only for the purpose of enabling the jury to judge for themselves whether the conduct of the woman was consistent with her testimony on oath given in the witness-box negativing her consent, and affirming that the acts complained of were against her will, and in accordance with the conduct they would expect in a truthful woman under the circumstances detailed by her. The jury, and they only, are the persons to be satisfied whether the woman’s conduct was so consistent or not. Without proof of her condition, demeanour, and verbal expressions, all of which are of vital importance in the consideration of that question, how is it possible for them satisfactorily to determine it?”

Other Questions


Is there any evidence that the estate has no assets to which resort can be made for redemption purposes? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Can evidence of a chemical analysis of a sample taken after the 2-hour period be used in evidence? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
When competing interest in a property is expressed in a caveat, can the first purchaser of the property, who filed a caveat at the same time as the second, have priority to the first? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Can an expropriated property be valued on a valuation based on immediate sale for use by the owner of the land for the purpose of building purposes? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Can a police officer obtain a blood sample from a patient in hospital for evidence purposes? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
How has the jury been instructed in a sexual assault trial to consider corroboration evidence? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the purpose of a loss of dependency award under the Fatal Accidents Act? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Does the trial judge err in allowing the respondent to introduce parol evidence? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Can the demeanour and emotional state of the complainant be considered as corroborative evidence? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Does a Traffic Safety Court Justice of the Peace (JPS) have any authority or authority to reject or reject the evidence presented by the defence? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.