Relevant to the circumstances in this case are the following principles regarding entitlement: (a) to relieve economic hardship that results from cohabitation or its breakdown. See: Moge v. Moge, 1992 CanLII 25 (SCC), [1992] 3 S.C.R. 813 (S.C.C.); (b) entitlement may be based on a compensatory or non-compensatory basis. See: Bracklow v. Bracklow, 1999 CanLII 715 (SCC), [1999] 1 S.C.R. 420 (S.C.C.)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.