What is the test for awarding double costs in a personal injury action?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from Brydon v. Thom, 2015 BCSC 479 (CanLII):

The guiding principles to be considered in awarding double costs have been discussed in Hartshorne v. Hartshorne, 2011 BCCA 29. The rationale for the rules discussed at para. 25 emphasizes that an award of double costs is a “punitive measure against a litigant for that party’s failure, in all of the circumstances, to have accepted an offer to settle that should have been accepted.”

Other Questions


What is the legal test for awarding double costs in a personal injury action? (British Columbia, Canada)
If historical driving records are relevant in personal injury actions, would they be relevant in a personal injury action? (British Columbia, Canada)
What factors will the court consider when determining whether to award double costs in a personal injury action? (British Columbia, Canada)
In a personal injury action for damages for personal injury, is there any case law where there is little or no objective evidence of continuing injury? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the effect of a double cost award in a personal injury case? (British Columbia, Canada)
In a personal injury action, is cost of future care a consideration in damages for future care costs? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a party to a personal injury action entitled to production of a party’s personal injury report? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the standard for awarding special costs in a personal injury action? (British Columbia, Canada)
In a personal injury action, has the court ever awarded special costs for non-disclosure of documents? (British Columbia, Canada)
In a personal injury action for damages for personal injury, what is the current state of the law on pain? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.