How have courts interpreted the principle of "the law of the law" in the context of Inland Revenue Com'rs?

Manitoba, Canada


The following excerpt is from Winnipeg (City) v. Sabourin, 1980 CanLII 2511 (MB QB):

Viscount Simon in the case of D'Avigdor-Goldsmid v. Inland Revenue Com'rs, [1953] A.C. 347 at p. 362, dealt with the principle in these terms: The liability of the subject under a taxing statute ought not to be arrived at by a course of subtle and sophistical argument and, even in the case of the most learned judicial pronouncement, it is well to recognize that on rare occasions bonus dormitat Homerus.

Other Questions


How have the courts interpreted the issue of continuing need in the context of the definition of “continence need” and “economic hardship or loss”? (Manitoba, Canada)
How have courts interpreted the meaning of the common law in the context of common law? (Manitoba, Canada)
What is the test for interpreting the Queen's interpretation of the Queen’s Speech to the Court of Appeal? (Manitoba, Canada)
How have the fiduciary principles been interpreted in the context of sexual assault cases? (Manitoba, Canada)
What are the principles of fundamental justice in the extradition context? (Manitoba, Canada)
What is the principle of implied or expressed in the context of a deposit under a contract? (Manitoba, Canada)
How have the courts interpreted the meaning of an inchoate or incomplete agreement between a buyer and seller? (Manitoba, Canada)
In what circumstances will the courts interpret legislation on public access to the records of recounts and scrutinies? (Manitoba, Canada)
What are the principles to apply in the context of a motion by a plaintiff to have his case considered on the merits of the motion? (Manitoba, Canada)
How have courts interpreted a heading in the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms? (Manitoba, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.