The authority cited by Tysoe J. for the principle that a court may re-open where a matter was not, but should have been, brought to the attention of a judge, was Hellinckx v. Large, [1998] B.C.J. No. 3072. In that case, Hutchinson J. allowed an application to re-open his prior judgment in order to correct a mathematical error which was conceded by the other party. He also allowed a re-opening to consider tax consequences that had not been argued or considered in the prior judgment.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.