Does the presumption of undue influence trigger?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from Simpson v. Simpson, 1997 CanLII 4396 (BC SC):

Counsel for the plaintiffs asserts on the foundation of Goodman Estate v. Geffen, 1991 CanLII 69 (SCC), [1991] 5 W.W.R. 389 (S.C.C.) that in that the transaction was a gift and that a parent and child relationship existed, that the presumption of undue influence is triggered. This is taken from the words of Wilson J. at page 407 where she suggests that the parent/child relationship means that there is the "potential" for influence, and that this potential triggers the presumption.

Other Questions


Is there a presumption of undue influence or presumption of domination? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the legal framework for analyzing proof in solemn form claims where issues of undue influence and undue influence are raised? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is undue influence sufficient to establish that there is no force or coercion to establish undue influence? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test to trigger a presumption of undue influence in the context of a commercial relationship? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is there any case law relating to undue influence or undue influence? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the effect of the presumption of undue influence on a jury? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the presumption of undue influence in real estate transactions? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is there a presumption of undue influence between a parent and adult child in a property transaction? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for the presumption of undue influence in real estate transactions? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for invoking the presumption of undue influence? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.