What is the effect of inordinate delay in determining the cause of death for a plaintiff's memory?

Ontario, Canada


The following excerpt is from Tambeau v. Martin, 2020 ONSC 2483 (CanLII):

A rebuttable presumption arises where such an inordinate delay has occurred, as the defendants are prejudiced by the substantial risk that a fair trial might not be possible. There are several reasons for the presumption. One recognizes that memories fade over time and another recognizes that justice delayed is justice denied. Expeditious justice is the objective. The presumption strengthens with the length of the delay. See Furtney Estate v. Furtney, supra at para. 61.

Other Questions


What is the effect of a delay in determining whether a party will be prejudiced by the delay? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for determining whether a plaintiff is a contributory or a cause? (Ontario, Canada)
Is there any potential hardship to the payor if the delay was caused by the delay due to the failure of the claimant's lawyer? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the effect of delay in determining the bias issue in the context of an interlocutory application? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the effect of estoppel on a plaintiff's right to continue to pursue a cause of action? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the effect of reference to age in the test for determining whether a plaintiff is a person of a different age? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the effect of a delay in obtaining an order from the Human Rights Tribunal for a delay of more than a year? (Ontario, Canada)
Does a delay of 5 months need to be considered an “inordinate” delay? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for determining the determination of a plaintiff's costs in a personal injury case? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for establishing cause of death for a plaintiff? (Ontario, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.