What is the predominant purpose of a disused public space where there is a large majority of the public is not allowed to enter?

Ontario, Canada


The following excerpt is from TST-80343-16 (Re), 2017 CanLII 28613 (ON LTB):

4. In Di Geso v. Fiset [1998] O.J. No. 3466, the court held “that the predominant purpose test is most appropriate where the demised premises appear to be mainly residential in use and where there is not a clear segregated area of the demised premises to which the public is invited to come.”

Other Questions


Is a police officer required to make a public announcement to enter a residential premise? (Ontario, Canada)
How have courts dealt with the issue of pre-trial publicity during a public inquiry? (Ontario, Canada)
How has the court considered control and access to the area in question in determining whether the public had access and invited to use the area on the private property for parking purposes? (Ontario, Canada)
In what circumstances will a landlord be held liable for failing to protect the public from the danger to which the public has been exposed? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the limitation on the purpose of a waiver under the Purpose of the waiver? (Ontario, Canada)
Is there any case law where damages for conspiracy where the purpose is to undermine contractual rights are determined to be at large? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for including gifts in the calculation of income for the purposes of the purpose of the gifts? (Ontario, Canada)
Is a police officer required to make a public announcement to enter a person's home? (Ontario, Canada)
Does a religious institution have to be assessed for purposes of assessment purposes? (Ontario, Canada)
Can a plea of qualified privilege be upheld where the words "qualified privilege" are published to the public generally or to the world at large? (Ontario, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.