What is the test for discriminatory provisions in municipal by-laws?

Alberta, Canada


The following excerpt is from 698114 Alberta Ltd. v. Banff (Town of), 2000 ABCA 237 (CanLII):

The principle was stated by Beetz, J. in Montreal v. Arcade Amusements Inc., supra, at (M.P.L.R.) 254: The rule that the power to make by-laws does not include that of enacting discriminatory provisions unless the enabling legislation provides the contrary has been observed from time immemorial in British and Canadian public law. It has been and still is applied in municipal law.

Other Questions


What is the effect of section 3(a) of the Montreal Municipal Bylaw on the rule of construction in the context of "noise which annoys, disturbs or detracts from the comfort, repose, health, peace or safety of other persons"? (Alberta, Canada)
Are fire suppression costs that are charged by a municipality pursuant to authority conferred on them by the Municipal Government Act? (Alberta, Canada)
Is a condominium corporation bound by its own bylaws or bylaws? (Alberta, Canada)
In what circumstances will a court order costs for a breach of section 7(2) of the Municipal Bylaw? (Alberta, Canada)
Does the Charter apply to discriminatory provisions of the September 1951 Proclamation? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the test for leave to appeal under s. 688(3) of the Municipal Government Act? (Alberta, Canada)
Is a fire protection bylaw retroactive or otherwise? (Alberta, Canada)
In what circumstances will a municipality revoke a building permit? (Alberta, Canada)
Does a municipality have to register or deposit a plan of survey of a public road? (Alberta, Canada)
Does the Arbitrator have to "explicitly address all possible shades of meaning" of contested provisions in their reasons? (Alberta, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.