The plaintiffs objected to the fact that travel, accommodation and meal expenses were charged for out-of-town counsel. In that regard, I agree with the comments of Brockenshire J. in Dinsmore v. Southwood Lakes Holdings Ltd., [2007] O.J. No. 263 (S.C.J.) at para. 18, that where a plaintiff sues a governmental or quasi-governmental agency, it would be reasonably expected that out-of-town counsel would be engaged, such that travel and accommodation charges were properly recoverable. See also Beland v. Hill, [2012] O.J. No. 3997 (S.C.J.) at para. 56.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.