What is the test for "extra caution" in a motor vehicle accident?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from Zaborniak v. Smerdal, 2014 BCSC 1367 (CanLII):

The plaintiff should have proceeded with “extra caution”: Lutley v. Southern, 2011 BCCA 299 (paras. 35‑37). She should not have proceeded into the intersection at speed (20‑30 KPH) without a full view of the intersection.

Other Questions


What is the test for determining whether a motor vehicle accident is an accident or an accident? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the difference between a motor vehicle accident and a subsequent motor vehicle collision? (British Columbia, Canada)
In a motor vehicle accident involving a stolen vehicle, can the driver of the stolen vehicle be held liable for damages? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the finding of fact in a motor vehicle accident where a driver misjudged the speed and distance of a vehicle travelling at 50 to 70 kilometres per hour? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the law on liability for an injured person who is injured in an accident while trying to rescue someone from a motor vehicle accident? (British Columbia, Canada)
How have courts interpreted the doctrine of a "phantom vehicle" in a motor vehicle accident claim? (British Columbia, Canada)
In a motor vehicle accident reconstruction case, can the accident reconstruction experts provide any assistance? (British Columbia, Canada)
In a motor vehicle accident, can a plaintiff continue to suffer from chronic neck and back pain for at least three years after the accident? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the legal test for using the word "superintendent of Motor Vehicles" in a motor vehicle application? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for establishing causation between a motor vehicle accident and a subsequent accident? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.