What is the thin skull rule in tort law?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from Vander Maeden v. Condon, 2013 BCSC 1389 (CanLII):

The most basic principle of tort law is that the plaintiff must be placed in the position he or she would have been if not for the defendant's negligence, no better or worse. The tortfeasor must take his or her victim as they find them, even if the plaintiff's injuries are more severe than they would be for a normal person (the thin skull rule). However, the defendant need not compensate the plaintiff for any debilitating effects of a pre-existing condition which the plaintiff would have experienced anyway (the crumbling skull rule): Athey v. Leonati, at paras. 32-35. The Plaintiff’s Position

Other Questions


Does the thin skull rule, or “thin skull rule” apply to the quantum of an award? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does a plaintiff have a thin skull and crumbling skull? (British Columbia, Canada)
How does the thin skull rule affect the crumbling skull rule? (British Columbia, Canada)
What are the "thin skull" and "crumbling skull" doctrines? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for determining whether a plaintiff is a "crumbling skull" rather than a thin skull? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for determining whether a plaintiff has a thin skull or crumbling skull injury? (British Columbia, Canada)
If a plaintiff has a crumbling skull, does the crumbling skull rule entitle her to additional damages? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the "crumbling skull rule" applied to a plaintiff in a motor vehicle accident case? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a plaintiff entitled to be treated as a thin-skulled plaintiff for the purpose of damage assessment? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the appropriate amount of compensation for a plaintiff who sustained a fractured skull in a motor vehicle accident? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.