What is the likelihood that this collision was minor?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from Pearlman v. Phelps Leasing Ltd., 2011 BCSC 1696 (CanLII):

Based on the evidence of the parties, and the photographs and estimate of minimal damage to the vehicles, I conclude that it is more likely than not that this collision was minor in nature. The forces to the plaintiff’s body were most likely minimal. The extent of the plaintiff’s injuries and complaints must be viewed in this context (Cahoon v. Brideaux, 2010 BCCA 228).

Other Questions


In a rear-end collision, does the following driver have any responsibility for causing the collision? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the difference between a plaintiff and defendant in a collision where neither party saw each other before the collision? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a plaintiff's soft tissue injury from a collision with another vehicle aggravated by a subsequent collision? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the duty of a servient driver in a collision involving a dominant driver to prevent a collision? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does a collision between 2003 and 2010 result in more severe soft tissue injuries? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the impact of a sudden, sudden appearance of a left-turning vehicle on the scene of a collision? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a minority shareholder retain their relative share position in the absence of an agreement to the contrary? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for determining who is to blame in a motor vehicle collision case? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a driver in a servient position be held responsible for the collision? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for assessing the likelihood of a plaintiff earning more than he would have earned if he had not been involved in an accident? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.