Counsel for the plaintiff cites Lee v. Ghadery, [1999] B.C.J. No. 2934 (S.C.), where a Walmart employee climbed a ladder to retrieve some merchandise for the plaintiff. The plaintiff held the ladder steady. The employee had neglected to secure the ladder and the plaintiff was injured as a result. Mr. Justice Josephson found the defendants liable at common law, but noted in dicta that although the ladder, being a chattel, is excluded from the definition of “premises”, the use of the ladder might constitute an activity conducted on the premises within the meaning of s. 3(2)(b) of the OLA.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.