The plaintiff’s counsel argues that since at least Walker v. Brownlee, 1952 CanLII 328 (SCC), [1952] 2 D.L.R. 450 (S.C.C.), a driver is entitled to assume other drivers will comply with the law, i.e. not go through a red light. The plaintiff’s counsel says that a similar argument about timing the light has been rejected in other cases, particularly where there is no independent evidence that the plaintiff was actually timing the light or no engineering evidence that the accident could have been avoided had the driver not been timing the light.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.