The defendants argue that damages must be reduced because the plaintiff was at high risk for back problems in any event. An asymptomatic non-tortious precondition, while not relevant to causation, may be taken into account in assessing contingencies. The question is whether the plaintiff would have become symptomatic at some point as a result of the pre-condition if the tort had not occurred: Larwill v. Lanham, 2003 BCCA 629 (CanLII).
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.