British Columbia, Canada
The following excerpt is from Fochler v. Dancer-Poulin & Barnes, 2007 BCSC 294 (CanLII):
In Thack v. Udenberg, [1988] B.C.J. No. 1471, the plaintiff had fallen from a ladder while assisting the defendant to shingle a chicken coop. The plaintiff had offered to help the defendant place shingles on the roof of the chicken coop. The defendant provided two identical five foot aluminium ladders and each of the plaintiff and defendant mounted a ladder. The plaintiff fell. The court found that the ground was level and free of debris and that the plaintiff mounted the aluminium ladder of his own volition. In mounting the ladder the plaintiff testified that he had shook it to test its stability as he reached each of the first three rungs. The court found that the plaintiff, had satisfied himself of the stability of the ladder and concluded that if a danger existed, it was obvious and the defendant was under no duty to warn the plaintiff against obvious dangers. The plaintiff’s claim was dismissed.
In Wray v. MacLeod, [1992] B.C.J. No. 1231, the plaintiff fell from a ladder while working at the home of her defendant son-in-law. The plaintiff and her husband had gone to the defendant’s home to assist their daughter and the defendant carry out renovations and repairs to their home. The defendant suggested that the plaintiff help paint the roof joists over an outside patio. She utilized a six foot wooden step-ladder and used paint brushes and rollers to reach the joists which were about nine feet from the floor of the patio. She used the ladder for about one and one-half hours before she fell.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.