Does a lump sum award in a personal injury case have to be discounted as a tax-free lump sum?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from Arnold v. Arnold, 2010 BCSC 166 (CanLII):

The plaintiff says that if it was the intent of the judgment to provide that a tax-free lump sum be paid to the plaintiff, the award should not be discounted. That might be the case, for example, if the lump sum was intended to be a retroactive award, as was the case in Kerman v. Kerman, 2008 BCSC 852.

Other Questions


What is the quantum of damages for personal injury awarded in a personal injury case? (British Columbia, Canada)
In a personal injury action for damages for personal injury, is there any case law where there is little or no objective evidence of continuing injury? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a plaintiff’s personal injury fund available for use in a personal injury litigation deduction? (British Columbia, Canada)
If historical driving records are relevant in personal injury actions, would they be relevant in a personal injury action? (British Columbia, Canada)
In a personal injury action, can a plaintiff recover large amounts of personal injury damages from a vocational consultant? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for calculating damages for personal injury in a personal injury case? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the range of damages for personal injury damages in a personal injury case? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a party to a personal injury action entitled to production of a party’s personal injury report? (British Columbia, Canada)
In a personal injury action for damages for personal injury, what is the current state of the law on pain? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for challenging an award for damages awarded by a jury in a personal injury case? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.