What is the test for rejecting an offer under Rule 9-1?
British Columbia, Canada
The following excerpt is from Miller v. Boughton, 2011 BCSC 632 (CanLII):
The plaintiff argues that the defendant’s previous offers under Rule 9-1 should not be considered. To support her position, the plaintiff relies on Oliver v. Moen, 2009 BCSC 874.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
When is an offer not an offer that ought reasonably have been accepted? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the burden of proving that a party making an offer to a prospective buyer of a dog is reasonable to expect that the offer ought to have been accepted? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the difference between an initial and comprehensive settlement offer made by the respondent and a revised offer to settle? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the penalty for a plaintiff who rejects a reasonable offer to settle? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for rejecting an offer of $1 to settle a personal injury claim? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is a reasonable time for an offer to be made at trial if an offer is not made within a specific time from the start of trial? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a plaintiff reject an offer to purchase lot 35 of the property for capricious reasons? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for whether an offer was an offer that ought reasonably to have been accepted? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can an offer that does not comply with Rule 37 B constitute an offer to settle? (British Columbia, Canada)
How is the reasonableness of a rejection of an offer without reference to the ultimate decision after trial? (British Columbia, Canada)
